John Polstra writes: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This is wrong. caddr_t should be uniersally replaced with void *. > > Not quite. There is (or at least used to be) a lot of code that > assumed you could do address arithmetic on a caddr_t. You can't do > that on a void *, at least not in ANSI C. I think gcc lets you do > it, but it's an extension.
As I have discovered. I specifically looked for this, and my misreading of the spec is now clear. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
