In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Santcroos writes:
>596: DEV_STRATEGY(bp); > >I don't understand what you want me to examine there as the arguments are >not usefull anymore (or are they?). Well that line in my copy was not code, so I just wanted to see what your sources said. >> >#15 0xc01edc7b in spec_specstrategy (ap=0x0) at ../../../fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:633 >> >> This, I think is impossible, so I think we should assume that something >> overwrite some memory and cleared out some bits which should have >> survived. > >That was my feeling too, it wouldn't have gotten so deep with NULL arguments. >Haven't checked the code so it is only an assumption. > >Any idea's what to do now or what to do when I am able to reproduce it? No idea at the moment. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message