On Sunday 02 February 2003 11:59 pm, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Edward Brocklesby wrote:
> > Maybe I missed something, but why cannot you just rip random() from libc,
> > rename it to bakul_shah_random() and use that in your testing code?  Then
> > you are safe from any changes to random(), and indeed have a portable RNG
> > if your host OS changes.
>
> Binary packages from third party software vendors.

What about them? They either,
a) link to a static libc, and use its rand() always; or
b) link to a shared libc, and use its rand(), as the binary API hasn't 
changed; or
c) if they really need their own specific RNG, they include it themselves, and 
don't rely on libc at all.

So I fail to see the problem here.

Regards,
Edward.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to