On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:51:27PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > true.. if it has a 'size' argument it would do what I was thinkng > > about.. > > We actually do have that in the new m_getm(). If you do a m_getm() it > allows you to specify 'size' and it will allocate a packet header mbuf > for you with external storage and may even allocate more than one and > chain them together for you in one shot and without dropping the > per-CPU cache lock, if it can get away with it. It does a 'best' fit > allocation so you effectively have your 'small,' 'big,' and 'real big' > scenario. cool I hadn't noticed that.. > > -- > Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
