At 2:02 PM -0800 2002/11/25, Terry Lambert wrote:

 If you made system dumps mandatory (or marked swap with a non-dump
 header in case of panic), this still would not handle the "silent
 reboot", "double panic", or "single panic with disk I/O trashed"
 cases.  8-(.
How about we do the safe thing, and only do background fsck if we can prove that the system state is something where it would be suitable? Or would that mean that we almost never do background fsck?

--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message


Reply via email to