On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not > (for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes). So just > going through and making everything unsigned is not the right > approach. I will make a pass through and consider changing some > of these fields once the tree opens back up, but not at this > point in time when we are trying to keep changes to a minimum > and do not have time for extensive testing. > > Kirk McKusick I'm not in a hurry.. It's just something that I thought should be considered..... "eventually". BTW how can fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes be -ve? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
