Shouldn't ALL of the files in /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/include, /usr/lib etc be replaced during an installworld?
I've always looked for files older than the last installworld and moved them aside thinking that they're obsolete. ( aside, not delete, just in case ) --On Monday, October 07, 2002 8:51 AM +0200 Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Greg > 'groggy' Lehey" writes: >> On Sunday, 6 October 2002 at 23:42:55 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:02:51PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>>> It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. >>>> Is it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very >>>> least, the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to >>>> run NFS. >>> >>> Are you saying we've left behind an old manpage? >> >> No, I'm asking whether we have left behind both an old man page and >> an old binary. >> >> On closer examination, though, it looks like this is the result of >> installing a 4.7 system and immediately upgrading it to 5-CURRENT, so >> that the dates of the files looked pretty much the same. Sorry for >> that confusion. What's the recommended way of getting old binaries >> off the system? > > I use: > cd /usr/src > make installworld DESTDIR=/some/where > diff -ur /some/where / > manual review. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by > incompetence. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
