On 10 Apr, Bruce Evans wrote:
>> * XXX
>> * Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
>> * as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
>> * both compilers.
>> Is this still valid? Does someone really use gcc 1 to compile FreeBSD?
>
> This became invalid before FreeBSD-2.0 was released.
>
> Most special cases to support gcc's before approx 2.7 are now bogus.
> Unlike the above, most of them are just for optimizations or for better
> diagnostics, so removing them shouldn't break compiling with old versions
> of gcc any more than not having the for other C compilers breaks compiling
> with other C compilers.
Thank you, I will remove them in my icc patches.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
