On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 06:17:13PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > > At Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:21:19 +0000 (UTC), > > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > I run an md based filesystem for /var/run so it is empty after startup. > > > Does that mean that I also need to take care of creating directories in > > > it during boot - and maintaining myself on every box. > > > Or it it the responsibility of the programms to enshure that the > > > directories they need are created? > > > > /var/run/named is created by mtree (/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist). If you > > want to use md(4) for /var/run, you should make directory after > > /var/run creation. > > Is it possible to make the md-filesystem automatically make the needed > subdirectories, when a program wants to create > /var/run/a/very/deeply/nested/file ?
That wouldn't work. The whole point of /var/run/named is to set the permissions on the directory such that a non-root user (the 'bind' user in FreeBSD typically) can write files in the directory. In order to create the named directory in /var/run, you need root privs. Give that to the program, and we are back where we started, no point in using /var/run/named, just use /var/run. > Or would that just be too ugly, mixing device drivers with high-level file > operations? Guess so.. Yeah, that too. It is not that big of a deal to hack this support for named into the rc scripts. It is a hassle when considering the "correct" way to handle this to make it extensible to other daemons we may wish to run in such a manner. -- Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message