On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's an example of a standard utility being clueless about symlinks to > > nothing: > > > > $ ln -s '' foo > > $ cp foo bar > > cp: foo is a directory (not copied) > > > > foo is certainly not a directory. The bug seems to be in fts. > > No, "foo" certainly _is_ a directory. It is precisely the same thing as > ".". No, the empty pathname has been invalid and not an alias for "." since at least the first version of POSIX. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Matt Dillon
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Matt Dillon
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Garance A Drosihn
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Assar Westerlund
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Matt Dillon
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Brian F. Feldman
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Bruce Evans
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Garrett Wollman
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Brian F. Feldman
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Terry Lambert
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Bruce Evans
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Bruce Evans