Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

[Kris Kennaway]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:17:25AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
> > > > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)
> > >
> > > The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here.  I
> > > could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES
> > > in libcrypt.
> > 
> > I failed to understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that we have
> > to follow a bad practice set by that precedent at any costs, or I parsed your
> > message incorrectly?
> 
> I'm saying "fix it both places, or it obviously is not a
> sufficient justification for a decision".
> 
> Or to put it another way "if you are willing to live with
> it in one place, why not two?".

What on earth are you talking about?

Kris

PGP signature