Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat]

[Andrey A. Chernov]

On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 17:01:08 -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
>     I'm sorry, I don't understand... what does this have to do with
>     an empty symlink verses a symlink containing something else?
>     'rm' does not traverse symlinks.

I not mean 'rm' literally.
Read Bruce's comment about how fake names constructed.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message