On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 07:44:59PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:32:55PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:54:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under
> > > Giant.
> > >
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_alloc/results.html
> >
> > Just for comparision, 6-way results are at:
> >
> > http://www.flugsvamp.com/~jlemon/fbsd/netpipe/
>
> Are you sure those aren't inverted? (i.e. swap(present, mb_alloc)?)
Yup, I'm sure. The 'local' tests were done last night, the 'stream'
tests were done today with the same pair of kernels.
> In any case, the mb_alloc code you used still has the malloc() and
> free() calls during cluster allocation and freeing and still, it looks to
> me as very comparable nonetheless.
The results look good to me; the only thing that really stands out
is the signature graph for stream tests; that odd curve at the start
of the run. However, if I'm interpreting it correctly, it shows
better performance in the mb_alloc case.
--
Jonathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
