On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring > each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is > not something that will scale as more and more archs are added. It isn't that hard to put the bits on Freefall and test on all arches. Especially for a _KERNEL_ patch that touches this many files -- some Alpha specific. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and s... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and s... David O'Brien
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session a... John Baldwin
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, sessi... David O'Brien
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, s... John Baldwin
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pg... David O'Brien
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pg... David O'Brien
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, s... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pg... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pg... David O'Brien
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, ... David O'Brien
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and s... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and s... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and s... Seigo Tanimura