In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" writes: : Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s): : > FYI: : > : > SYNOPSIS : > portmap [-d] [-v] : > : > SYNOPSIS : > rpcbind [-dilLs] : : yup, so i think it makes sense, to have the daemon called rpcbind, since : it would probably break other people's configuration after making world. I do not. -v could easily be added to what is now rpcbind (even if it was ignored). -d mean the same thing for both. there's then no reason to change its name. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind Andrew Reilly
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpc... Greg Lehey
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcb... Warner Losh
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to ... Karsten W. Rohrbach
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Doug Barton
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Karsten W. Rohrbach
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Doug Barton
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Peter Wemm
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Karsten W. Rohrbach
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... David O'Brien
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Warner Losh
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Robert Watson
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Matt Dillon
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Matt Dillon
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed... Brooks Davis
- Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to ... Doug Barton