Hi All,
        Is anyone looking at supporting the Intel ICH2-M IDE controller?
This controller is basically the same as the ICH2 controller except it has
extra powermanagment features as it's the for portable computers (hence
the M=mobile). I'm currently using the attached patch which runs
flawlessly on my laptop. However, I'm just an amature code hacker and
hence can't guarentee I haven't missed something between the chipsets.

The other question I have is why in ata-dma.c is there the fall through to
the ICH chipset? It seems to prevent any drive actually using ATA100/UDMA5
features.

Cheers,
--
* Benjamin Close
diff -u ./ata-dma.c fred/ata-dma.c
--- ./ata-dma.c Fri Mar 16 02:06:25 2001
+++ fred/ata-dma.c      Sun Mar 25 10:33:52 2001
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@
 
     switch (scp->chiptype) {
 
+    case 0x244a8086:   /* Intel ICH2-M */
     case 0x244b8086:   /* Intel ICH2 */
        if (udmamode >= 5) {
            int32_t mask48, new48;
@@ -150,7 +151,8 @@
                    ata_printf(scp, device,
                               "%s setting UDMA4 on ICH%s chip\n",
                               (error) ? "failed" : "success",
-                              (scp->chiptype == 0x244b8086) ? "2" : "");
+                              (scp->chiptype == 0x244b8086) ? "2" : 
+                              (scp->chiptype == 0x244a8086) ? "2-M" :"");
                if (!error) {
                    mask48 = (1 << devno) + (3 << (16 + (devno << 2)));
                    new48 = (1 << devno) + (2 << (16 + (devno << 2)));
diff -u ./ata-pci.c fred/ata-pci.c
--- ./ata-pci.c Tue Mar 20 00:01:58 2001
+++ fred/ata-pci.c      Sun Mar 25 10:30:58 2001
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@
     case 0x24118086:
        return "Intel ICH ATA66 controller";
 
+    case 0x244a8086:
+       return "Intel ICH2-M ATA100 controller";
+
     case 0x244b8086:
        return "Intel ICH2 ATA100 controller";
 

Reply via email to