If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote:
> "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:13:17PM -0600, Michael C . Wu scribbled:
> > | On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:03:29PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah scribbled:
> >
> >
> > I have just finished making the patch to fix this problem.
> > I will start the buildworld now. In the mean time,
> > if someone has a fast box, please test the patch at
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~keichii/fix-current-broken-man-build.diff
>
> I kinda object to backing this stuff out. The problem is elsewhere. This
> stuff builds correctly on its own, it is something wrong with the world
> environment. eg: do a 'make install' in src/share/mk and the world works
> fine. Since this seems to be needed, the problem is in 'world', not these
> makefiles.
Huh?!?
Ruslan's commit was intended to remove (most of the) MAN8= definitions
in certain Makefiles. That's great.
Unfortunately, in some cases, he also removed SRCS= definitions, which is
not so good inasmuch as it breaks buildworld. Either he deleted too
much out of the Makefiles, or the SRCS= removal was intentional and
should have been documented in the commit message (as far as I can tell
this has *nothing* to do with manpages).
Michael's patch (which unbreaks buildworld) only backs out the SRCS=
changes.
Feel free to hand me a giant clue if I'm missing something really
obvious. In other words, is world *supposed* to build in the absence of
SRCS= definitions?
Bruce.
PGP signature