:>     down and will work, SNAP, just like that?
:
:Because I need to make folks other than you happy.
:
:Lots of security minded people what _all_ the interrupt entropy
:they can get, and this method gives them that while allowing others
:to throttle the harvester back.
:
:M
:-- 
:Mark Murray
:Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

    And if I were paranoid I could setup an interrupt a thousand times
    a second to scan all of physical memory and harvest the randomness 
    from that.

    I am a security minded person... and I am also pragmatic.  There's
    such a thing as overkill and your random number generator is doing
    it in spades.  It is entirely unnecessary.  Maybe rather then throw
    in the overkill you should actually *test* the random number generator
    to see where the randomness starts to break down when lowering the
    harvest rate.  Thousands of harvests a second is just plain insane,
    no matter how security minded your 'lots of security minded people' 
    are.  Just ten a second should be plenty good enough, frankly, even
    for a paranoid security minded guy, especially considering the amount
    of memory the random number generator is using for state.

                                        -Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to