Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If there's something better than Daniel's solution that doesn't > require a major bump and is compatible with the old libc.so.5 api, > then I'm all for that. I'd love to test it out as well if there's any > desire for that. Yes, there is. Steal _cookie, rename it to _ext or something like that, and make it point to a separate structure that contains _cookie and the mutex. Optionally add a #define to avoid changing libc code that uses _cookie. That's not what Peter intends to commit, though. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Dag-Erling Smorgrav