Hi,
> I think you're the main maintainer of the ACPICA codebase (and yes, I know
> that parts of it is imported from Intel). Attached is a trivial patch which
> makes for cleaner testing for RB_POWEROFF in acpi_shutdown_final() - I've had
> various kernel/userland routines invoke reboot sequences where the howto had
> more bits set than RB_POWEROFF, e.g. RB_NOSYNC. With this patch, shutdown -p
> works for me :)
Thanks, this patch looks good. I'll fix this soon.
I'm sure mike will agree on it :-)
> Thanks for all the work on ACPICA :)
>
> G'luck,
> Peter
>
> PS. Please CC: me in replies as I'm not on -current.
>
> --
> If I had finished this sentence,
>
> Index: acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -r1.7 acpi.c
> --- acpi.c 2000/12/12 14:20:27 1.7
> +++ acpi.c 2000/12/18 14:55:43
> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@
> {
> ACPI_STATUS status;
>
> - if (howto == RB_POWEROFF) {
> + if (howto & RB_POWEROFF) {
> printf("Power system off using ACPI...\n");
> if ((status = AcpiSetSystemSleepState(ACPI_STATE_S5)) != AE_OK) {
> printf("ACPI power-off failed - %s\n", acpi_strerror(status));
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
