In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams writes: : > > Probably the same time-frame for SunOS, although I didn't have : > > experience with it until the early 90's. However, if necessary, I can : > > try and dig out installation docs for some software which ask to have : > > the stuff unpacked in /usr/local. : > : > I'd certainly be interested in that. : : It'd be Purify. Try also Interleaf, FrameMaker, the elan license manager, eroff, lucent emacs binaries for the net, TeX binaries from the net, gosling emacs, and I think informix. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Applix problems (Was: /usr/local abuse) Mike Meyer
- Re: Applix problems (Was: /usr/local abuse) David O'Brien
- Re: Applix problems (Was: /usr/local abuse) Mike Meyer
- Re: Applix problems (Was: /usr/local abuse) David O'Brien
- Re: Applix problems (Was: /usr/local abuse) Mike Meyer
- Re: Applix problems (Was: /usr/local abuse) David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activatio... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activatio... Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activatio... Warner Losh
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Nate Williams
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Nate Williams
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activatio... Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activatio... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activatio... Wes Peters
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Warner Losh