[redirected to just -current; I'm not sure what this has to do with -net] > I agree. I've been using them for a while on my dog slow Windows CE > machine. There were some minor issues when they were first committed > to NetBSD on some platforms (due to a too early use of ps and some > brokeness in ps on pmax, for example), but these were quickly > resolved. So, who wants to do a proof-of-concept implementation for -current which integrates with our existing rc.conf mechanism? In order to obey POLA, we should at least have the separate scripts switch off the same knobs whenever possible. It's something I'd be willing to do, I guess. I have some history with the rc.foo files. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Bill Vermillion
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Terry Lambert
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Garance A Drosihn
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Garrett Rooney
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Garrett Wollman
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewal... David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewal... Garrett Wollman
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewal... Terry Lambert
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Warner Losh
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Nik Clayton
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Warner Losh