On Dec 9, 2025, at 07:22, Rozhuk Ivan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:23:52 -0800 > Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But, as of yet, I've no good evidence for blaming >> jemalloc as a major contributor to those timing >> ratios --or for blaming any other specific part >> of 15.0 . > > If you want to bench jmalloc - there is another ways to do that without > building something. > Try to find some sythetic benchmarks. > Also jmalloc can be build without OS rebuild and linked with bench. > > This 2 things can reduce time to tests, but it will eliminate OS integation > factors. > Run same bench on different OS may give more info. >
[I've eliminated direct Email to most everyone for this reply. There is not even minor new technical content.] At this point I'm more likely to explore if I get similar ratios as ampere[13] do for some port-package builds that have the large ratios on ampere[13]. There are examples that are not as overall time consuming for ampere[13] as what I've already referenced (but are still non-trivial for the time taken). As stands, I do not have a good reproduce-the-issue context, much less one with build time frames I'd be willing to deal with in my environment. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com
