On Sun, Dec 7, 2025 at 7:31 PM Rozhuk Ivan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Dec 2025 11:07:48 +0100 > Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is to say, if you have time, can you please benchmark a > > statically linked clang vs clang which merely reverting the libprivate > > change? Should be a small speed up on top. > > NO_SHARED - it was static link with libc and probably other system libs. > Now clang splitted into set of libs, it is a bit different thing. >
It is indeed a different thing and I am saying it also likely reduces performance compared to what it can be without the recent libprivat problem. It very much warrants benchmarking.
