On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 06:06:54PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: > On 8/28/25 17:21, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 7:26 PM Olivier Cochard-Labbé <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm still waiting for our contributions about this stabweek before > > closing the week. > > > > > > > > > > The "August 2025 stabilization week" is now over. > > > > This stabweek has been more challenging than usual, so please be aware of > > the following known issues: > > > > 1. OpenSSL 3.5.1: The legacy provider is broken, causing some ports to > > fail. A temporary fix is to use `env CRYPTOGRAPHY_OPENSSL_NO_LEGACY=1`. Cf > > an example of regression in PR/273656 > > > > 2. MIT Kerberos: The default Kerberos is now MIT. Clients should migrate > > smoothly, but some scripts may need adjusting. Machines running kdc must > > continue to use Heimdal by setting WITHOUT_MITKRB5="yes" in /etc/src.conf. > > > > 3. Still empty Pkg repo today: The official package repository is > > currently almost empty. Don't run `make delete-old-libs` unless you're > > prepared to build packages from source. A bug in the current version of pkg > > means that running `pkg upgrade` might result in the removal of many > > packages due to this empty repository state. > > > > 4. ABI Breakage: A recent ABI change in `setgroups(2)` and `getgroups(2)` > > syscalls will cause some packages to crash. These packages must be rebuilt. > > > > At the risk of being both repetitive and pedantic, I note once more that it's > important to emphasize that they must be rebuilt > *if you are not running a kernel with COMPAT_FREEBSD14*. The distinction is > quite important because if you're not running > GENERIC or MINIMAL and you need to rebuild, ok, cool, that's the usual > process. If you're running GENERIC or MINIMAL and > you need to rebuild, I really want to hear about it because that means I > broke something that wasn't supposed to break. >
To be correct, this is not an ABI breakage. Old binaries which are linked against setgroups@FBSD_1.0/SYS_freebsd14_setgroups#80, get the old behavior. The new behavior of setgroups@FBSD_1.8/SYS_setgroups#596 is what hits the old unaware code _after recompilation and linking_. I.e. while being perfectly ABI compatible there, we get some nuanced new behavior that is impossible to detect at the compile time. I was assured that the advantages of this change overcome the inconvinience. not assuming egid presence is provided > > 5. ZFS Kernel Panic: We've identified a 100% reproducible kernel panic > > when running ZFS regression tests. The bug has been reported on PR/289131. > > The FreeBSD CI ZFS tests have not been running for about a month, with the > > latest run also resulting in a panic too [1]. > > > > Thanks for your reports, > > > > Olivier > > > > [1] https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64-test_zfs/14237/console > > <https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64-test_zfs/14237/console> >
