On Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
COMPAT_FREEBSD14? (Recently [gs]etgroups were changed, with compatibility syscalls moved to COMPAT_FREEBSD14).UPDATING only mentions VMM stuff for COMPAT_FREEBSD14. I give this a try tomorrow. But would this also affect the zfs dataset stuff?
This thread could have been a simple UPDATING update. I think this is the fourth time or so I have run into problems, because the changes were not explained. UPDATING entry on VMM got only there after I've spent 2 days+ troubleshooting my wifibox failures. When I read your message I was immediately thinking you might need "COMPAT_FREEBSD14", but, again, I couldn't find any obvious entry neither in the docs nor in the git log I was looking at. @glebus - maybe during the stabilization effort the changes done to the tree could be reviewed and documented? - where the FreeBSD_version got bumped and why - ABI changes - .... For example it could be useful to be able to find the information "what does COMPAT_FREEBSD14 do exactly" in the UPDATING/release notes file. Otherwise I can't be sure if I need that option or "is my system fresh enough" to remove it from the kernel. Marcin Cieślak
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
