On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:59:14PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 08:04:19AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:23:12PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:07:09AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > > In short, I'd love to widen the interface, but there's a number of 
> > > > practical
> > > > issues in the way.
> > > 
> > > I think caching something in the kernel of later retrieval or adding a
> > > new return path to the ABI is the wrong way around.  Instead I think the
> > > right solution is for each thread to register a userspace buffer.  You
> > > end up adding one or two entries to struct thread (pointer to a
> > > structure or pointer to an buffer and length) and if the pointer is
> > > non-NULL you copyout a string to the buffer.  This avoids signficant
> > > new storage in the kernel and means programs that won't use this data
> > > don't see it.  It also means that the debugger can access it without
> > > needing a new PT_ argument.
> > > 
> > > As a minor downside you would introduce some new error conditions if the
> > > programmer messes up registration, but we'd probably just have libthr do
> > > it in most cases (that would be more debugger friendly since you
> > > could hang it off a known location in userspace).
> > 
> > I mostly agree with this proposal, and can implement it.
> > I strongly object against blowing the kernel with MBs of strings.
> > 
> > Userspace can register per-thread extended errno location, and kernel
> > can copyout the ext-errno when returning error.
> 
> I really want them to be strings in the kernel.  Anything else is too
> annoying to maintain and will interact poorly with running old versions
> of userspace and introduce namespace complications for downstreams.
> 
> If you want the option to save the space, make the interface that copies
> the string out a macro and provide an option to compile them away.
> (Using a macro would also allow you to transparently embed e.g., file,
> function, or line information if desired.)

D50483 Extended errors from kernel

Reply via email to