Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 22:05 schrieb Alexander Leidinger <alexan...@leidinger.net>: > Attention, "upgrade" is overloaded here. "OS upgrade" will not render the > pool unbootable (modulo bugs), but "zpool upgrade rpool" will (except we have > provisions that zpool upgrade doesn't enable all features in case the bootfs > property is set).
And we are back at the start. The "problem" is that I really like consistency. So when "zpool status" throws that ominous message at me - any you have to admit that it is phrased like a warning - I want simply to get rid of that. After a reasonable after-update grace period. But during our discussion I have come to wonder: - I upgrade from 13.0 to 13.1, I do a "zpool upgrade" afterwards, I also upgrade the boot loader - I install 13.1 with ZFS What is the difference? Shouldn't these two imaginary systems be absolutely the same in terms of ZFS features, boot loader, and all that? Kind regards, Patrick
