On 22/01/2022 23:20, Rick Macklem wrote:
Mark Saad <nones...@longcount.org> wrote:
[stuff snipped]
So I am looking at the Apple and Solaris code, provided by rick. I am not
sure if the illumos code provides SMB2 support. They based the solaris
code on Apple SMB-217.x which is from OSX 10.4 . Which I am sure
predates smb2 .
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/smb/tree/smb-217.19
If I am following this correctly we need to look at Apple's smb client
from OSX 10.9 which is where I start to see bits about smb2
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/smb/tree/smb-697.95.1/kernel/netsmb
This is also where this stuff starts to look less and less like FreeBSD .
Let me ask some of the illumos people I know to see if there is
anything they can point to.
Yes. Please do so. I saw the "old" calls fo things like open and the
new ntcreate version, so I assumed that was the newer SMB.
If it is not, there is no reason to port it.
The new Apple code is a monster. 10x the lines of C and a lot of
weird stuff that looks Apple specific.
It might actually be easier to write SMBv2 from the spec than port
the Apple stuff.
--> I'll try and look at whatever Microsoft publishes w.r.t. SMBv2/3.
Thanks for looking at this, rick
The docs are public:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-smb2/5606ad47-5ee0-437a-817e-70c366052962
Note that the spec is 480 pages, it is not a trivial protocol to
implement from scratch.
David
