Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de> wrote: > > Michael Grimm:
>> Correct? If so I wonder how future security advisories and errata notices >> will be composed. Will there be a date of the commit besides its hash being >> reported? > > For over TWENTY YEARS, FreeBSD advisories have already contained > the date when the problem was corrected, e.g.: Ups, sorry for my fading memory ;-) I must have concentrated solely to the revision numbers and descriptions in order to find out whether to recompile or not. > I think it is safe to assume that this practice will continue after > the switch to Git. Thanks to all who responded and helped me to understand what to expect. Pointing me to git-rev-list(1) has been very helpful. I came to the conclusion that I will name my BE by date and time of latest pull before buildworld or buildkernel, e.g. 2025_0955. That will help me to make decision as mentioned above. With kind regards, Michael _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
