On 2020-12-17 21:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I hope we don't have to start signing all commits. saltstack/salt has
> that policy, and it's extremely annoying.
Have to? Not currently. As with all process changes, there will be
community discussion around the different points.
Warner
I hope not!
Signatures, at least in email messages, are just an annoyance as I see
them.
I don't even know how do sign an email message or make use of a
signature in a message I receive.
I have never made a commit to a repository, so would not be familiar
with signatures there; imagine it would be a barrier.
Tom
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I'm not a FreeBSD committer, but on other git projects I sign my
commits. AFAIK it's a good idea.
I'm curious what is annoying about it? It's just adding the 'sign' tag.
If you want a portable GPG key check out something like a yubikey. I'm
sure there's other portable hardware options.
# git commit -S -m "message"
You can also set to always sign automatically,
# git config --global commit.gpgsign true
--
Waitman Gobble
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
