On 2020-11-27 00:29, tech-lists wrote:
Hi,

What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's opinion?

I can't speak for the whole list. ;-)
But in my opinion with tables totaling over 150 million IPs. I'm casting a vote for pf(4). It's wildly easy on resources and as fast and flexible as I could ever
hope to want. Started using it years ago, and never looked back. :-)


There's pf, ipf and ipfw. Which is the one being most recently developed/updated? I'm used to using pf, have done for over a decade. But OpenBSD's pf has diverged a lot more from when it first came across. There seems to be a lot more options.
Is FreeBSD's pf being actively developed still?

Yes. It is actively developed.

ipfw seems a lot more syntatically complex than pf. Is it more capable also?
I know nothing about ipf yet.

[1] up-to-date, versatile, low overhead, high throughput, IPv6-able,
traffic shaping/queueing

thanks,

--Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to