On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Ronald Klop <ronald-li...@klop.ws> wrote:
> Van: Rick Macklem <rmack...@uoguelph.ca> > Datum: dinsdag, 1 september 2020 04:37 > Aan: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> > Onderwerp: should rpctlssd be called rpc.tlssd? > > > > This sounds trivial, but I thought I'd ask, in case anyone > > has a preference? > > > > The NFS over TLS code includes two daemons, one for > > the client and one for the server. > > I have called them rpctlscd and rpctlssd. > > > > There was/is a tradition in Sun RPC of putting a "." in > > the names. > > So, should I be calling these daemons: > > rpc.tlscd and rpc.tlssd? > > I don't have an opinion about the rpc* vs rpc.* tradition. > But what I do not understand is why the difference between 2 daemons > is only reflected in 1 character of their names. The rest of the > name is actually not really significant in keeping them apart. > I had the same reaction. Maybe something like rpc.tlsclntd and rpc.tlsservd? -- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
