On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 09:20, David Chisnall wrote:
>
> On 19 May 2019, at 20:43, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> >
> > the best
> > explanation of democracy I have ever heard was: "two wolves and a
> > sheep deciding what to have for dinner!"
>
> If you believe that this quote in any way supports your argument, then I 
> would suggest that you work through the game theoretic implications of this 
> structure.
>
> (Hint: if the sheep can abstain, the sheep is never eaten and even without 
> abstention the sheep isn’t going to be eaten today)

Wow, what an art of arbitrary context switching! If anything, you
demonstrate utter failure of understanding how the
herd-rule^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdemocracy works: "majority wins;" for some
contrived reason you seem to think that *everyone* needs to have
voted... On top of that, if you want people to hear you, quit making
opaque assertions, and muster some brain cells to set out an
argument...

Regardless, you, too, are attempting to (rather badly) reframe the
original problem and divert discussion, and the original problem was
whether or not CoC should restrict freedom of expression. Do you have
anything to say on *this* topic?

-- 
Igor M.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to