Am Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:00:18 -0700 Conrad Meyer <c...@freebsd.org> schrieb:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:21 PM, O. Hartmann <ohartm...@walstatt.org> wrote: > > Am Sat, 15 Apr 2017 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) > > Bruce Evans <b...@freebsd.org> schrieb: > > > >> Author: bde > >> Date: Sat Apr 15 20:03:50 2017 > >> New Revision: 316977 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/316977 > > > > There is a lot of development going on theses days for syscons. What's > > about vt()? > > vt() is considered broken for x11/nvidia-driver and vt() is considered a > > requirement > > when UEFI is boot scheme, isn't it? > > > > I'm just curious. > > Hi O., > > Bruce uses syscons and cares enough to improve it. He likely does not > care about UEFI and definitely does not care about vt. I don't think > there's anything wrong with that. We can't force volunteers to work > on things they are not interested in. > > Best, > Conrad Hello Conrad, happy easter. There is and was never intention to apply "force", it is a question as I'm curious about what's going on with vt() - no personally bound to B. Evans or anybody else - I just took the chance to comment/ask on that subject when I saw postings. Maybe not the right place to spread some thinkings. Regards, Oliver Hartmann -- O. Hartmann Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG).
pgp6JmhcQ2VBg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
