On 03/26/2015 23:20, Eric Badger wrote: > Using log(9) when no process is reading the log results in the message > going only to the console (contrast with printf(9), which goes to the > console and to the kernel message buffer in this case). I believe it is > truer to the semantics of logging for messages to *always* go to the > message buffer (where they can eventually be collected and in fact put > into a logfile). I therefore propose the attached patch, which sends > log(9) to the message buffer always, and to the console only if no one > has yet opened the log.
This makes sense to me. Since I'm new here, I'll wait for others to comment. Eric _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
