On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 10:07:25PM -0400, Danny J. Zerkel wrote: > > pr/9350 is an example of db bugs effecting vi. > (Would someone PLEASE apply the simple patch and close the damn PR!) Ok. I've applied to my local sources. If it passes my next makeworld and doesn't crash things on me, I'll commit it. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Julian Elischer
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Brad Knowles
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Brad Knowles
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Nate Williams
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? David Scheidt
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Sheldon Hearn
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Garance A Drosihn
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Danny J. Zerkel
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? David O'Brien
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Vallo Kallaste
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Richard Todd