On 24 October 2014 12:17, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I remember the main reason for keeping oldnfs, both server and client, > around in HEAD was to facilitate MFC of fixes to the branches which > still use oldnfs, i.e. stable/8. If this reason is still valid, oldnfs > have to stay in HEAD till stable/8 is supported or interested for > developers. > > I usually do not like direct commits into the stable branches. > Otherwise, I see no reason to keep oldnfs around.
I only see real value in that if we're actually building and testing it on HEAD on a regular basis though. If we don't build it by default on HEAD and don't generally test it there, I think we're actually worse off to commit changes to HEAD first and then MFC. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
