On 26-Apr-00 Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Yes, that's what I'm doing now - so far the best method. But still > requires having N+1 boxes (which is not a concern for me, but for someone > having e.g. 2 boxes in production this represents 1/3 increment), plus > topology allowing for using NFS mounts. True, depending on your setup you can do it ON your production machine :) Or on your workstation etc.. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Patchkits Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP... Jim Bloom
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld obj... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kl... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: SMP changes and breakin... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: SMP changes and breakin... David Malone
- Re: SMP changes and breakin... Jesper Skriver
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compat... Steve Passe
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module c... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object modu... Jonathan M. Bresler
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object ... Matthew Dillon
- RE: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compat... Alok Dhir
- RE: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compat... Alok Dhir
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compat... Steve Passe