On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues <rodr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, >> unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which >> was *not* redundant. :-/ > > > Warner, > > Is there a way to bring back the behavior of r257658 but without > the way it was implemented with the EARLY_BUILD flag? > It would be handy, as we can see by this thread discussion. The EARLY_BUILD flag tightly coupled the bsd.*.mk files to the build system, so I’l like to see it stay dead. 9.x assumes that by defining it, it can affect the system installed .mk files in a specific way. This is an unwise assumption, as this thread demonstrates. The real problem, imho, is that the construct in bsd.prog.mk is generating a dependency on the wrong C++ standard library. Why is it generating for the g++ library when the compiler is clang? That seems like the real bug here. I’ll also note that building release X-2 on head isn’t generally supported by the project, but having said that, I’ll see what I can do. Surprisingly, I don’t have a good -current environment setup on my fast build boxes, so I’ll setup a quick jail and see if I can recreate. Warner
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
