Mike Muir wrote: > > Nate Williams wrote: > > > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > > branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that > > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. > > That would kinda make sense since cvsuping with tag=RELENG_3 seems to > give me FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (#0: Sat Apr 22 20:59:03 PDT 2000).. Ok wait im a moron.. been using the stable-supfile instead of the 4.x-stable-supfile.. hmmmmm. mike. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Matthew Dillon
- To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ques... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Mike Muir
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Mike Muir
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Mike Nowlin
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Nate Williams
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Mike Muir
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Mike Muir
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed t... Rodney W. Grimes
- SMP changes and breaking kld object module com... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object mo... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Kenneth Wayne Culver