On 06 Mar 2014, at 01:08, Thomas Mueller <mueller6...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >>> Thanks for the fast work! The patched solve the problem for me and I >>> was able to install and run firefox on 11.0-CURRENT i386. > >> I have imported the upstream fix for this bug in r262809, and I will MFC >> it after one week. Happy Firefoxing. :-) > >> -Dimitry > > Does this mean the bug is fixed in 11-current?
Yes, the bug is fixed in 11-CURRENT, as of Subversion revision r262809. > MFC? Is that to 10-STABLE? Your message is less than clear. In FreeBSD, fixes are first applied to head (a.k.a -CURRENT), then after a certain period they are merged to one more -STABLE branches, depending on the type of fix. This procedure is traditionally called a Merge From Current, MFC. In this particular case, I will merge the fix to both 10-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Older branches do not have clang, so merging the fix to them makes no sense. > I figure if firefox build fails, the bug would affect some other ports as > well. Don Lewis already mentioned the libxul port, and in general, any port based on certain parts of the Mozilla source tree could be affected. -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
