On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Kimmo Paasiala <kpaas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Eric van Gyzen <e...@vangyzen.net> wrote:
>> I just installed 10.0-BETA1 using the [very cool] new automatic ZFS
>> option.  I noticed that /var/empty is not mounted read-only.  I suspect
>> it could be.  I made it so, and sshd still seemed to work.
>>
>> Eric
>
> I don't think there's a standard for how to break down the ZFS pool to
> individual datasets. If the install made only a single dataset for
> /var you would then effectively get a read-write /var/empty. The

*The same applies*

> applies if you install on UFS and don't assign a separate filesystem
> for /var/empty like the default install does in fact.
>
> -Kimmo
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to