In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: > The general problem with the timecounter is that not only is the hardware > indeterminant, but the timecounter structure itself is *NOT* MP safe, > at least not by my read of it. Well, read again then :-) I've had a paper in the works about timecounters for over a year now, I should really sit down and finish it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Using packed structs to gain cheap SMP prim... Garrett Wollman
- RE: Using packed structs to gain cheap SMP ... Allen Pulsifer
- RE: Using packed structs to gain cheap ... Allen Pulsifer
- Re: Using packed structs to gain cheap ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Using packed structs to gain c... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Using packed structs to gain cheap SMP ... Mike Smith
- Re: Using packed structs to gain cheap ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance tests Bruce Evans
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance test... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP buildworld times / perform... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance ... Warner Losh
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance ... Mike Smith
- Re: SMP buildworld times / perform... Jesper Skriver
- Re: SMP buildworld times / per... Mike Smith
- Re: SMP buildworld times / per... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance test... Eric D. Futch
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance tests Andy Farkas
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance tests Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance tests Peter Wemm
- Re: SMP buildworld times / performance tests Matthew Dillon