On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:58 AM, hiren panchasara
<hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With revision=246484, it seems we have hit the limit.
> At $WORK we have one more flag and to accommodate that we need to bump this
> up.
>
> Can p_flag be bumped up to u_long?
>
> Index: proc.h
> ===================================================================
> --- proc.h (revision 245937)
> +++ proc.h (working copy)
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
> * The following don't make too much sense.
> * See the td_ or ke_ versions of the same flags.
> */
> - int p_flag; /* (c) P_* flags. */
> + u_long p_flag; /* (c) P_* flags. */
> enum {
> PRS_NEW = 0, /* In creation */
> PRS_NORMAL, /* threads can be run. */
>
> Thanks,
> Hiren
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I see at least two problems here:
- The change you propose may result in a KBI breakage.
- sizeof(unsigned long) == 4 on some archs, e.g. my i386 Atom, which
makes the change uneffective.
Thanks,
Davide
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
