:At 10:04 PM -0800 2000/3/29, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> So softupdates improves buildworld times by a significant margin.
:
: Uh, I think we've known this for a while now. ;-)
:
: Still, I'm looking forward to finding out what the new timings
:are for SMP builds with the new code (both with and without
:softupdates), and I still can't wait to get this stuff MFC's to
:4.0-STABLE.
:
:======================================================================
:Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV
4694.193u 1477.722s 1:10:24.37 146.1% 1364+1646k 10077+4118io 1734pf+0w 5.0
softupdates on
4696.987u 1502.278s 1:10:34.17 146.4% 1359+1641k 10889+4270io 1779pf+0w 5.0
softupdates on
4745.607u 1673.646s 1:29:07.45 120.0% 1323+1599k 8237+251565io 1615pf+0w 4.0
softupdates off
4745.062u 1668.094s 1:28:58.04 120.1% 1323+1601k 8022+251525io 1787pf+0w 4.0
softupdates off
4712.080u 1678.329s 1:16:29.38 139.2% 1330+1609k 11714+130429io 1692pf+0w 4.0
softupdates on
4708.749u 1674.349s 1:16:20.60 139.3% 1331+1608k 11512+130477io 1479pf+0w 4.0
softupdates on
6 minutes 20 seconds (about 7%). I am still getting a major difference in
the I/O stats, though it is much less then before. But now I have no
clue as to why that last I/O parameter is so different.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
