On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Gas notices the problem for "movl $-FOO,%eax": > : z.s: Assembler messages: > : z.s:1: Error: Negative of non-absolute symbol FOO > :Similarly for the a.out case. Complementation is equivalent to negation > :on 2's complement machines, so gas should produce this error for $~FOO too. > > Ok, so who do we send your excellent analysis to at GNU-C? I think > this is a rather serious bug myself since a programmer can make a > simple labelname mistake and get incorrect code instead of an error. Don't know. David O'Brien has been doing most of the GNU contacting. > Also, probably a simple mistake but complement != negation. > I think ~F = -F - 1; I meant that has equivalent complexity. All normal assemblers and object formats handle offsets, so if they can handle "~" then they can probably handle "-". Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- UP kernel performance and Matt Dillon's patches Gary Jennejohn
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt Dillon's patc... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt Dillon's ... Gary Jennejohn
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt Dillo... Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt Dillon's patc... Matthew Dillon
- Very weird assembly failure (was Re: UP kern... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Very weird assembly failure (was Re:... Chris Piazza
- Re: Very weird assembly failure (was... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Very weird assembly failure (was Re:... Bruce Evans
- Re: Very weird assembly failure (was... Matthew Dillon
- Re: UP kernel performance and M... Bruce Evans
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt Dillon's ... Geoff Rehmet
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt Dillo... Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt D... Matthew Dillon
- Re: UP kernel performance and M... Alain Thivillon
- Re: UP kernel performance a... Matthew Dillon
- Re: UP kernel performance and Matt Dillon's patc... Chris Piazza