On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Rick Macklem <rmack...@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
... > WITHOUT_KERBEROS is used other places, like telnetd. Were you aware of that? > (I just thought it would keep it consistent, but if you think it is better > to use a different name, I don't care.) Ah, no. I wasn't aware of that :). Given that something else has been standardized around the tree, I agree that your approach of using WITHOUT_KERBEROS is ok. I wasn't keen on the name just because it could have simplified the code using a positive instead of a negative predicate in the #ifdef. I looked at the updated patch and it looks good to me :). Thanks! -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
