> > It seems to me (and my buildworld agree with this)
> > that 'liby' is also not necessary for building of 'libipsec'.
>
> liby is used. Linking to the static version of it isn't good.
> I think it results in functions from liby.a being included in
> libipsec.so. Since liby.a isn't compiled with -fpic, it's not
> clear how this can work. I think the linker prints RRS warnings
> when it doesn't work. I haven't seen those, so maybe it does
> work.
>
> Bruce
In the build after the trial change of removing liby
dependency from libipsec Makefile, misteriously libipsec is
not built as if it is just neglected, and buildworld
continues. :-\
Yoshinobu Inoue
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
