On 2012-11-05 17:21, Alexandre Martins wrote:
Since FreeBSD 8.0, there is some changes about routing table, in particular
the IPv4 'link-local' route.

In my case, i have this config: em0 192.168.0.1 / 24


In FreeBSD < 8, if I run 'route get 192.168.0.0', it tell me :

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    route to: 192.168.0.0
destination: 192.168.0.0
        mask: 255.255.255.0
   interface: em0
       flags: <UP,DONE,CLONING>
  recvpipe  sendpipe  ssthresh  rtt,msec    rttvar  hopcount     mtu  expire
        0         0         0         0         0         0      1500   -537398
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

And in FreeBSD >= 8

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
route: writing to routing socket: No such process
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Maybe the command parsing got more strict?  It looks like you must add
the netmask to make it work:

  $ route -n get 192.168.0.0
  route: writing to routing socket: No such process

  $ route -n get 192.168.0.0/24
     route to: 192.168.0.0
  destination: 192.168.0.0
         mask: 255.255.255.0
    interface: iflan
        flags: <UP,DONE>
   recvpipe  sendpipe  ssthresh  rtt,msec    mtu        weight    expire
         0         0         0         0      1500         1         0

This is on stable/9.


In addition, if I run a ping on network and broadcast address
  (ping 192.168.0.0; ping 192.168.0.255)

In Freebsd < 8, a new route was created and i can see it in
  'netstat -rn -af inet'

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet:
Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
192.168.0.0           ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff  UHLWb       1        1   em0 =>
192.168.0.255      ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff  UHLWb       1        1   em0 =>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

But not in FreeBSD >= 8


So, why is the broadcast route not created in FreeBSD >= 8 ?

Apparently the route to 192.168.0.0/24 already covers both of them, so
there is no need anymore to add explicit ones.  I have no idea why this
changed after 8.x, though.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to